New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document Sage's documentation style, in particular use ".. FOO::" rather than ".. foo::" #22188
Comments
Branch: u/jhpalmieri/NOTE |
Commit: |
comment:4
I doubt #22178 will change any more, but it will be a trivial fix if git doesn't automatically handle the merge. |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:5
PDF docs don't build:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:7
Oops, there was a missing backquote. Should be fixed now. |
comment:9
Hum, not building html for me on sage-on-gentoo
|
comment:11
See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5464627/how-to-have-same-text-in-two-links-with-restructured-text Apparently you need two underscores instead of one in
I am guessing in both occurrence of that particular string. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:13
Both citations should point to the same place, so I've changed their targets instead. |
Changed branch from u/jhpalmieri/NOTE to |
The preferred style in Sage documentation is for Sphinx directives to be in upper case:
.. NOTE::
rather than.. note::
, for example. We should document this.CC: @tscrim
Component: documentation
Author: John Palmieri
Branch/Commit:
7da959b
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22188
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: