givaro does not pass self-tests on 32bit systems

[sagetrac-tmonteil]

See the attached build log givaro-4.0.2.p0.log and the corresponding failing test suite test-suite.log.

Depends on #24214

Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug.

CC: @ClementPernet

Component: packages: standard

Keywords: sdl

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23056

[sagetrac-tmonteil]

Attachment: givaro-4.0.2.p0.log

Attachment: test-suite.log

[sagetrac-tmonteil]

Upstream: Reported upstream. No feedback yet.

[sagetrac-tmonteil]

comment:2

In case, the difference between 94499109968480 and 94499109902944 is 2^16.

[ClementPernet]

comment:3

This was linbox-team/givaro#39 which I had erroneously closed, as it did not show up for while.
I reopened the issue. Note that on our CI build, the difference is 2^13 x 13, 2^15 or 5x2^14.

[ClementPernet]

comment:4

Note that the field that causes this bug ModularExtended<double> is not being used in sage.

[sagetrac-tmonteil]

Changed upstream from Reported upstream. No feedback yet. to Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug.

[sagetrac-tmonteil]

comment:6

Replying to @ClementPernet:

Note that the field that causes this bug ModularExtended<double> is not being used in sage.

Thanks for the hint, let me remove the blocker priority. But i guess it is still healthy to provide upstream packages well-tested and with their whole capabilities (also, we might use that field later in Sage).

[ClementPernet]

Dependencies: #24214

[ClementPernet]

comment:7

fixed in #24214

[fchapoton]

comment:8

is this fixed now ? should we close this ticket ?

[ClementPernet]

comment:9

I confirm that this ticket can be closed. Sorry for having forgotten to close when #24214 was fixed.

[sagetrac-tmonteil]

comment:10

I confirm that givaro 4.0.4 builds and pass self-tests on my 23bit VM.

[embray]

comment:11

Presuming these are all correctly reviewed as either duplicate, invalid, or wontfix.

[sagetrac-tmonteil]

Changed keywords from none to sdl