New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
polredabs does not does not always return the correct transformation map #23259
Comments
comment:1
The following shows that the error already occurs in pari.
|
Changed upstream from Not yet reported upstream; Will do shortly. to Reported upstream. No feedback yet. |
comment:3
Submitted at: https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/archives/pari-dev-1706/msg00006.html |
Changed upstream from Reported upstream. No feedback yet. to Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release. |
comment:4
This has been fixed upstream in commit 1420fa40a which can be found at: https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pari.git;a=commit;h=1420fa40a7d7b43cf2d21c530a0a1d394bac245d |
Commit: |
Branch: u/mderickx/23259 |
comment:6
Merge conflict (the patch needs to be based on |
Author: Maarten Derickx |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:9
This line is horrible
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:11
Replying to @videlec:
I changed the doctest to something more elegant. Is it better now? |
Reviewer: Vincent Delecroix |
comment:12
Indeed. Thanks for this fix! |
Changed branch from u/mderickx/23259 to |
In this example I ask pari to polredabs a polynomial
f
and also return a transformation maph
such thath(x)
is a root off
inQQ[x]/g
.The above shows that f,g and h don't satisfy the promised relation.
Changing the leading term of f from 12 to 11 does give something correct.
This error was produced on SageMath version 7.6 on OS X 10.12.
Upstream: Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release.
CC: @koffie
Component: number fields
Author: Maarten Derickx
Branch/Commit:
d097929
Reviewer: Vincent Delecroix
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23259
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: