New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LLL_gram, clarifying and handling undefined behavior when self
is not positive definite
#23581
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:2
Doc does not build :
You need to respect the doc syntax (http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_basics.html). |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:5
there should be an empty line after and for the reference to pari, you can use the trac role, that creates an hyperlink:
|
comment:6
in the doctests, the syntax is
you forgot the double colon and the empty line just after it. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:10
Thanks for the tips! Only after doing |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:12
I think it is all good now. |
comment:13
There is a mixture of qfllgram and qflllgram. How many l's are there ? |
comment:15
I have fixed the number of l's. Sorry for the delay, totally missed your comment. Cheers, |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Reviewer: Aly Deines |
comment:19
Looks good. Just a few changes. I think
should be
If you change that and remove all trailing whitespace, I'll give you a positive review. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Changed keywords from none to days88 |
comment:22
Thanks! |
Changed branch from u/edgarcosta/LLL_gram to |
I tried to make it clear that
self
must be positive definite and showed some examples where things can go awry if that is not the case.I tempted to mention LLLGram in magma that seems to address this issues, and might a nice alternative through
magma_free
Component: linear algebra
Keywords: days88
Author: Edgar Costa
Branch/Commit:
2e12286
Reviewer: Aly Deines
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23581
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: