We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
After #23706 it appears that different implementations do not provide the same randomization algorithms. This is annoying for accurate comparisons
sage: with seed(42): ....: MatrixSpace(QQ, 2, implementation='flint').random_element() [ -1 -1] [-1/2 2] sage: with seed(42): ....: MatrixSpace(QQ, 2, implementation='gap').random_element() [ 1/4 -4/3] [ 1 0] sage: with seed(42): ....: MatrixSpace(QQ, 2, implementation='generic').random_element() [ 1/4 -4/3] [ 1 0]
The same occurs over cyclotomic field. The reason is that there is a home made randomize method in these cases.
randomize
Component: linear algebra
Keywords: days88
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23717
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
After #23706 it appears that different implementations do not provide the same randomization algorithms. This is annoying for accurate comparisons
The same occurs over cyclotomic field. The reason is that there is a home made
randomize
method in these cases.Component: linear algebra
Keywords: days88
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23717
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: