New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid _element_constructor in padics #23884
Comments
comment:2
I like small self-contained tickets, not patchbombs. |
comment:3
Also because |
comment:5
Branch does not work :-( New commits:
|
Commit: |
comment:7
Replying to @simon-king-jena:
In sage.rings.padics, not much is failing actually:
namely
As it seems, int conversion has to be fixed. Strange. If ZZ works, int should work as well... |
comment:8
Odd.
Conversion works and coercion is supposed to be transitive. |
comment:9
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:13
Instead of using
for consistency with other parts of Sage and for robustness (in case Element becomes a Python class). |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
comment:15
Done. |
Reviewer: David Roe |
comment:16
Looks fine to me. |
Changed reviewer from David Roe to David Roe, Travis Scrimshaw |
Changed branch from u/jdemeyer/avoid__element_constructor_in_padics to |
See #23880.
CC: @simon-king-jena @koffie
Component: padics
Author: Jeroen Demeyer
Branch/Commit:
6878e67
Reviewer: David Roe, Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23884
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: