New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace lcalc by PARI #24532
Comments
comment:2
Tests are showing that (at least for some use cases) PARI is slower than lcalc. Part of the reason is that lcalc has optimizations for specific L-functions while PARI works in much larger generality. So replacing lcalc is a bad idea. |
Branch: u/jdemeyer/replace_lcalc_by_pari |
Commit: |
comment:4
I'm still pushing the branch in case somebody wants to play with it. New commits:
|
comment:5
That's a shame. |
comment:6
I don't know how lcalc works at all, but maybe said optimizations can be ported upstream to PARI? |
comment:7
lcalc is not a trivial package :-) The PARI developers are aware of lcalc and what it does. So, if it would be easy, they would already have done it. |
CC: @embray
Component: packages: standard
Branch/Commit: u/jdemeyer/replace_lcalc_by_pari @
57769fa
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24532
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: