Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix signature of Matrix_gfpn_dense.__init__ #24863

Closed
jdemeyer opened this issue Feb 28, 2018 · 11 comments
Closed

Fix signature of Matrix_gfpn_dense.__init__ #24863

jdemeyer opened this issue Feb 28, 2018 · 11 comments

Comments

@jdemeyer
Copy link

The signature of Matrix_gfpn_dense.__init__ is different from the other matrix constructors. Fix this.

CC: @simon-king-jena

Component: linear algebra

Author: Jeroen Demeyer

Branch/Commit: 3c079b2

Reviewer: Simon King

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24863

@jdemeyer jdemeyer added this to the sage-8.2 milestone Feb 28, 2018
@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

Commit: 3c079b2

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

comment:2

Simon: this is really part of #24742 but I made a separate ticket in case the particular __init__ signature is somehow important to you.


New commits:

3c079b2Fix signature of Matrix_gfpn_dense.__init__

@simon-king-jena
Copy link
Member

comment:3

Replying to @jdemeyer:

Simon: this is really part of #24742 but I made a separate ticket in case the particular __init__ signature is somehow important to you.

No, the commonly used signature is fine for me.

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

comment:4

So, would you be willing to give positive review (assuming that tests pass)?

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

comment:5

Note that the mutability parameter is non-standard, but I actually like it.

@simon-king-jena
Copy link
Member

comment:6

Replying to @jdemeyer:

Note that the mutability parameter is non-standard, but I actually like it.

I am not sure if I actually use that parameter, but if possible I'd prefer it to be preserved.

The patchbot complains about a non-ascii character. Apart from that, it would be positive review.

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

Reviewer: Simon King

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

comment:7

Replying to @simon-king-jena:

The patchbot complains about a non-ascii character.

I don't think so. It looks like the patchbot plugin itself is generating a UnicodeDecodeError.

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

jdemeyer commented Mar 2, 2018

comment:8

Note that the code of Matrix_gfpn_dense.__init__ will change completely in #24742, but those should make no functional difference.

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Mar 5, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants