New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Finite field elements should not have a _matrix_ method #24865
Comments
Commit: |
New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton |
comment:4
the doc of the matrix method may need to start by |
comment:5
Replying to @fchapoton:
Is there are particular reason? The patchbot is green... |
comment:6
I have seen a \dots in the doc. But ok, let it be.. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
comment:8
I changed it anyway. I guess it doesn't hurt. |
Changed branch from u/jdemeyer/finite_field_elements_should_not_have_a__matrix__method to |
This is unexpected:
because one would typically expect a scalar matrix instead:
This is because finite field elements implement
_matrix_
and this takes priority in the matrix constructor.Proposal: rename
_matrix_
tomatrix
to make it usable as ordinary method.Component: linear algebra
Author: Jeroen Demeyer
Branch/Commit:
bde1b85
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24865
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: