New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
some care for magma interface #25306
Comments
Branch: u/chapoton/25306 |
New commits:
|
Commit: |
Changed keywords from none to magma |
comment:5
I tested it against Magma v2.23-8 but many doctests failed. I have opened #25408 for this issue, where there are 12 failures listed; 8 of them still fail with this patch installed. |
comment:7
Could we agree to use this as a first step ? I would like to have the matrix enhancements at my disposal. |
Changed branch from u/chapoton/25306 to u/davidloeffler/25306 |
comment:9
OK, I see your point. The perfect is the enemy of the good, as the saying goes. I pushed a patch which fixes a couple more doctests that were failing (no code changes) -- if you're happy with that then please set the ticket to positive review. New commits:
|
comment:10
thanks. good for me. Note that the Kronecker representation seems to have changed betwen my version of m*gma and yours.. |
Reviewer: David Loeffler |
comment:11
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:13
Oops, I forgot to flag this doctest as #optional-magma. |
Changed branch from u/davidloeffler/25306 to |
because parts of it are broken for magma V2.22
and also enhance its treatment of matrices.
CC: @loefflerd
Component: interfaces
Keywords: magma
Author: Frédéric Chapoton
Branch/Commit:
ba69135
Reviewer: David Loeffler
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25306
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: