Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow more substitutions for non-classical rational function field valuations #25441

Closed
saraedum opened this issue May 25, 2018 · 25 comments
Closed

Comments

@saraedum
Copy link
Member

See MCLF/mclf#39 for a motivation of this.

CC: @sagetrac-swewers

Component: number theory

Author: Julian Rüth

Branch/Commit: 1607493

Reviewer: Stefan Wewers

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25441

@saraedum saraedum added this to the sage-8.3 milestone May 25, 2018
@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Branch: u/saraedum/25441

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

comment:2

I just disabled the safeguards that I had certainly put there for good reasons. I could imagine that without these I'd need more logic to fix things related to comparison and equality of valuations.


New commits:

94cd188Drop the limitation on automorphisms of non-classical function field valuations

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Commit: 94cd188

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 28, 2018

Changed commit from 94cd188 to 2a93f94

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 28, 2018

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

2a93f94Merge remote-tracking branch 'trac/develop' into 25441

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

comment:4

I'll monkey patch this in MCLF for MCLF/mclf#39 so swewers can play with this and see whether this actually works.

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

comment:5

swewers: Does this change seem to work? If so, I'd prepare it for actual inclusion in Sage.

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Work Issues: merge in develop to make build pass

@sagetrac-swewers
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-swewers mannequin commented Jun 11, 2018

comment:6

Yes, the code in https://github.com/MCLF/mclf/tree/develop uses this change, and it seems to work.

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Jun 20, 2018

Changed commit from 2a93f94 to e9505c9

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Jun 20, 2018

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

c7741b4Merge branch '25441' into HEAD
e9505c9Add tests for 94cd188

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Changed work issues from merge in develop to make build pass to is the patchbot happy?

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

New commits:

c7741b4Merge branch '25441' into HEAD
e9505c9Add tests for 94cd188

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

saraedum commented Jul 4, 2018

Changed work issues from is the patchbot happy? to none

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

saraedum commented Jul 4, 2018

comment:9

The failed plugins seem to be noise.

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Jul 4, 2018

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

c31eb21Merge branch '25441' into HEAD

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Jul 4, 2018

Changed commit from e9505c9 to c31eb21

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

saraedum commented Jul 4, 2018

comment:11

swewers: Do you think you could review this one?


New commits:

c31eb21Merge branch '25441' into HEAD

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Jul 4, 2018

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:

1607493Merge develop and 25441

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Jul 4, 2018

Changed commit from c31eb21 to 1607493

@sagetrac-swewers
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-swewers mannequin commented Jul 20, 2018

comment:13

This works as it should. Thanks.

@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Jul 22, 2018

comment:14

Real name needed in the reviewers section.

@sagetrac-swewers
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-swewers mannequin commented Jul 24, 2018

Reviewer: Stefan Wewers

@sagetrac-swewers
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-swewers mannequin commented Jul 24, 2018

comment:15

Sure. Sorry for this.

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Aug 11, 2018

Changed branch from u/saraedum/25441 to 1607493

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants