New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversion error in Real Ball Fields #25456
Comments
comment:1
In the current RBF implementation rejecting Integers types as rad parameter seems intentional.
Is there a good reason to keep it that way ? Any advices are welcome. |
Changed keywords from none to thursdaysbdx |
Author: Vincent Delecroix |
New commits:
|
Commit: |
Branch: u/vdelecroix/25456 |
comment:4
It would be nice to support more general radii, but:
|
duplicate of #23430 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Calling RBF with two parameters and using a sage Integer as radius provoke a TypeError.
Same error with
RBF(0,5)
.CC: @seblabbe @videlec @mezzarobba
Component: basic arithmetic
Keywords: thursdaysbdx
Author: Vincent Delecroix
Branch/Commit: u/vdelecroix/25456 @
2d4ff24
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25456
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: