New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow with_bounds to work on non-facade posets #25846
Milestone
Comments
Branch: u/deinst/fix_poset_with_bounds |
Commit: |
New commits:
|
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:3
Trivial PEP8 thing: -P = posets.PentagonPoset(facade = False)
+P = posets.PentagonPoset(facade=False) Once changed, you can set a positive review on my behalf. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:5
Sorry, Thanks. |
Changed author from David EInstein to David Einstein |
Changed branch from u/deinst/fix_poset_with_bounds to |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently with_bounds is not implemented on non-facade posets. This may or not be a good idea, as often one would want the elements in the old poset and the poset with bounds to be comparable, and therefore having
facade=True
, but the current behavior is surprising.We should either document that with_bounds does not work with non-facade posets, or create an implementation
Component: combinatorics
Author: David Einstein
Branch/Commit:
3658311
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25846
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: