New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
py3: care for .iteritems #26056
Comments
Commit: |
New commits:
|
Branch: u/chapoton/26056 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
Changed branch from u/chapoton/26056 to u/tscrim/26056 |
comment:3
For
vs before
At the very least, it yields cleaner Cython code. If my changes are good, then positive review. New commits:
|
comment:4
ok, thanks. I have made one more commit that just fixes a wrong syntax inside one I allow myself to set to positive. New commits:
|
Changed branch from u/tscrim/26056 to public/ticket/26056 |
comment:5
Merge conflict |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:7
Travis, I have doubts about the line
as it seems that e has been renamed entries ? EDIT: it's ok, in fact |
comment:8
the rebase was trivial, I am setting back to positive |
Changed branch from public/ticket/26056 to |
possibly duplicate with #25948 (which is stalled) ?
CC: @embray @tscrim
Component: python3
Author: Frédéric Chapoton
Branch/Commit:
1e90626
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26056
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: