Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

principal_part_bound can be wrong when key has multiple slopes #26144

Closed
saraedum opened this issue Aug 28, 2018 · 21 comments
Closed

principal_part_bound can be wrong when key has multiple slopes #26144

saraedum opened this issue Aug 28, 2018 · 21 comments

Comments

@saraedum
Copy link
Member

Currently, the following fails:

sage: R.<x> = QQ[]
sage: v_2 = QQ.valuation(2)
sage: f = x^36 + 1160/81*x^31 + 9920/27*x^30 + 1040/81*x^26 + 52480/81*x^25 + 220160/81*x^24 - 5120/81*x^21 - 143360/81*x^20 - 573440/81*x^19 + 12451840/81*x^18 - 266240/567*x^16 - 20316160/567*x^15 - 198737920/189*x^14 - 1129840640/81*x^13 - 1907359744/27*x^12 + 8192/81*x^11 + 655360/81*x^10 + 5242880/21*x^9 + 2118123520/567*x^8 + 15460204544/567*x^7 + 6509559808/81*x^6 - 16777216/567*x^2 - 268435456/567*x - 1073741824/567
sage: v_2.mac_lane_approximants(f)
AssertionError

with the changes proposed by this ticket, this is

[[ Gauss valuation induced by 2-adic valuation, v(x + 2056) = 23/2 ],
 [ Gauss valuation induced by 2-adic valuation, v(x) = 11/9 ],
 [ Gauss valuation induced by 2-adic valuation, v(x) = 2/5, v(x^5 + 4) = 7/2 ],
 [ Gauss valuation induced by 2-adic valuation, v(x) = 3/5, v(x^10 + 8*x^5 + 64) = 7 ],
 [ Gauss valuation induced by 2-adic valuation, v(x) = 3/5, v(x^5 + 8) = 5 ]]

CC: @sagetrac-swewers

Component: padics

Author: Julian Rüth

Branch/Commit: e47eded

Reviewer: Stefan Wewers

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26144

@saraedum saraedum added this to the sage-8.4 milestone Aug 28, 2018
@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Branch: u/saraedum/26144

@saraedum

This comment has been minimized.

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

New commits:

e8b1d62Properly handle repeated key polynomials

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Commit: e8b1d62

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Work Issues: is the patchbot happy?

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Aug 28, 2018

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

7186bc6Improve documentation of mac_lane_step()

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Aug 28, 2018

Changed commit from e8b1d62 to 7186bc6

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Aug 28, 2018

Changed commit from 7186bc6 to 8bf1144

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Aug 28, 2018

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

8bf1144Comment on principal_part_bound correctness

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Aug 29, 2018

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

bde9084Clarify the meaning of principal_part_bound

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Aug 29, 2018

Changed commit from 8bf1144 to bde9084

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Changed work issues from is the patchbot happy? to none

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

comment:7

The patchbot errors are Magma errors and unrelated.


New commits:

bde9084Clarify the meaning of principal_part_bound

@sagetrac-swewers
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-swewers mannequin commented Aug 29, 2018

Reviewer: Stefan Wewers

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Aug 29, 2018

comment:9

merge conflict

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Nov 21, 2018

Changed commit from bde9084 to e47eded

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Nov 21, 2018

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

e47ededMerge remote-tracking branch 'trac/develop' into 26144

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

Work Issues: is the patchbot happy ⇒ positive review

@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

saraedum commented Dec 8, 2018

Changed work issues from is the patchbot happy ⇒ positive review to none

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Dec 23, 2018

Changed branch from u/saraedum/26144 to e47eded

@embray
Copy link
Contributor

embray commented Dec 28, 2018

comment:15

This tickets were closed as fixed after the Sage 8.5 release.

@embray embray modified the milestones: sage-8.5, sage-8.6 Dec 28, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants