Don't mention #940 as a problem anymore

[novoselt]

It was gone, there is a test for it.

CC: @videlec @sagetrac-tmonteil

Component: interfaces

Author: Andrey Novoseltsev

Branch/Commit: 97eb56d

Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26950

[novoselt]

Branch: u/novoselt/drop940

[novoselt]

Commit: 97eb56d

[novoselt]

New commits:

97eb56d

Do not mention the problem from #940 as it is gone

[videlec]

comment:3

Removing a comment is ok but removing a doctest is not.

[novoselt]

comment:4

There is this test repeated by the patch from #940 later on in the file.

[fchapoton]

comment:5

The other doctest is not exactly the same; it is missing the line

sage: a = octave.eval(t + ';') 

[novoselt]

comment:6

And what exactly is this line testing? That eval works? Isn't it tested by eval itself? In the removed version it is claimed that it works fine, but presumably the other one was taking too much. My understanding is that the problem of #940 was gone and there is a test for it with the reference to that ticket. So I think there should not be a block in the module docstring that specifically says that there is a problem and #940 has to be fixed.

[fchapoton]

Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton

[fchapoton]

comment:7

ok, well. Then let it be..

[novoselt]

comment:8

Thank you!

[vbraun]

Changed branch from u/novoselt/drop940 to 97eb56d