Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade normaliz to 3.7.2, pynormaliz to 2.5 #27731

Closed
mkoeppe opened this issue Apr 26, 2019 · 43 comments
Closed

upgrade normaliz to 3.7.2, pynormaliz to 2.5 #27731

mkoeppe opened this issue Apr 26, 2019 · 43 comments

Comments

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Apr 26, 2019

Another update of normaliz, pynormaliz.
The upgrade of PyNormaliz from 2.1 to 2.5 fixes a critical data conversion bug (Check overflow for int conversion correctly) that was present in all previous versions.

Tarballs - see wget commands below.


Step by step instructions if you want to try it out

  1. Go to the Sage source tree and pull the branch associated to this ticket

  2. Get the tarballs and put them in the upstream repository

$ wget -P upstream https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/releases/download/v3.7.2/normaliz-3.7.2.tar.gz
$ wget -P upstream https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/31/8f/a1e8e489150a570c81b427d351a29b868df57015f13c12e8e6d2d2d55c45/PyNormaliz-2.5.tar.gz
  1. Compile and install everything
$ sage -i pynormaliz
  1. Run make
$ make build

Depends on #27782

CC: @w-bruns @jplab @sebasguts @mkoeppe @videlec @tscrim

Component: packages: optional

Author: Matthias Koeppe

Branch: 0a8c6f8

Reviewer: Vincent Delecroix

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27731

@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-8.8 milestone Apr 26, 2019
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Apr 26, 2019

Dependencies: #27682

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Apr 26, 2019

Branch: public/27731

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Apr 26, 2019

New commits:

eaa4584package e-antic 0.1.3b0
e5c669dupgrade normaliz
14d6c83Update normaliz to 3.7.1, pynormaliz to 2.1
64f1f19fix doctest in backend_normaliz.py
3d949a2Upgrade normaliz to 3.7.2, pynormaliz to 2.2

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Apr 26, 2019

Commit: 3d949a2

@videlec
Copy link
Contributor

videlec commented Apr 26, 2019

comment:4

Hi,

What is the point of having several open tickets concerning Normaliz/PyNormaliz upgrade? You want the job of the release manager to become a nightmare? If Normaliz/PyNormaliz are not mature you should not have set anything to needs review in the first place. Also, you are shipping a beta version of e-antic which is not nice either.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Apr 26, 2019

comment:5

3.7.1/2.1 are stable and an improvement over the existing versions in sage. The ticket #27682 is positively reviewed already, and per release manager, positively reviewed tickets are not to be modified further.

@videlec
Copy link
Contributor

videlec commented Apr 26, 2019

comment:6

PyNormaliz provides a test suite, there should be a spkg-check.

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Apr 27, 2019

Changed commit from 3d949a2 to b488911

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Apr 27, 2019

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

b488911Add build/pkgs/pynormaliz/spkg-check

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Apr 27, 2019

comment:8

PyNormaliz test suite currently fails with the e-antic bug-fix release 0.1.3b0 that we have in #27682.

@mkoeppe

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe changed the title upgrade normaliz to 3.7.2, pynormaliz to 2.2 upgrade normaliz to 3.7.2, pynormaliz to 2.4 May 1, 2019
@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 1, 2019

Changed commit from b488911 to 5d01388

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 1, 2019

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

5d01388Upgrade pynormaliz to 2.4

@mkoeppe

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe changed the title upgrade normaliz to 3.7.2, pynormaliz to 2.4 upgrade normaliz to 3.7.2, pynormaliz to 2.5 May 1, 2019
@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 1, 2019

Changed commit from 5d01388 to a4e5977

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 3, 2019

Changed commit from a4e5977 to d44a00d

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented May 3, 2019

comment:18

(The canonicalization of the output files is a good idea anyway and takes care of differences in dictionary orders between py2 and py3.)

@jplab
Copy link

jplab commented May 3, 2019

comment:19

Compiles cleanly on debian.

Running tests using pynormaliz in the folder src/sage/geometry/polyhedron:

$ sage -t *.py
Using --optional=bliss,dochtml,e_antic,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,normaliz,pynormaliz,python2,sage,topcom
Doctesting 25 files.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

and without:

$ sage -t *.py --optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,python2,sage,topcom
Using --optional=bliss,dochtml,gfortran,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,ninja_build,python2,sage,topcom
Doctesting 25 files.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

@jplab
Copy link

jplab commented May 5, 2019

comment:20

Merge conflict with the new beta.

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 7, 2019

Changed commit from d44a00d to dd9a81b

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 7, 2019

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

dd9a81bMerge tag '8.8.beta4' into t/27731/public/27731

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 7, 2019

Changed commit from dd9a81b to 0a8c6f8

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented May 7, 2019

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

9b3a5baFix error message in doctest for new pynormaliz version
0a8c6f8Merge branch 't/27782/1_pynormaliz_doctest_failing_in_src_sage_geometry_polyhedron_backend_normaliz_py' into t/27731/public/27731

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented May 7, 2019

Changed dependencies from #27682 to #27782

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented May 8, 2019

comment:24

Needs review again!

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented May 14, 2019

Changed branch from public/27731 to 0a8c6f8

@seblabbe
Copy link
Contributor

comment:27

As I reported on sage-release for 8.8.beta6, I get troubles installing pynormaliz.

Is this normal doctor?

@seblabbe
Copy link
Contributor

Changed commit from 0a8c6f8 to none

@videlec
Copy link
Contributor

videlec commented May 23, 2019

comment:28

Replying to @seblabbe:

As I reported on sage-release for 8.8.beta6, I get troubles installing pynormaliz.

Is this normal doctor?

Could you check whether there is a config.log in

/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pynormaliz-2.5

and if so attach it.

@seblabbe
Copy link
Contributor

comment:29

No config.log:

$ ls /home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pynormaliz-2.5
checksums.ini  package-version.txt  spkg-install  src
dependencies   spkg-check           SPKG.txt      type

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented May 23, 2019

comment:30

It would of course be in the src subdirectory.

@seblabbe
Copy link
Contributor

comment:31

The complete pynormaliz-2.5.log file is pasted on framabin here

In particular, there is this line:

    configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first

Maybe this has to do with the fact that my brother asked me to try to test this ticket one month ago where I installed a previous version of those packages?

@seblabbe
Copy link
Contributor

comment:32

Replying to @mkoeppe:

It would of course be in the src subdirectory.

No config.log file in the src directory, but there is a config.py.in:

$ cd /home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pynormaliz-2.5/src
$ ls
config.py.in  doc       m4                  PyNormaliz.py  setup.py
configure     examples  NormalizModule.cpp  Readme.md      tests
COPYING       GPLv2     PKG-INFO            setup.cfg
$ cat config.py.in 
# Configuration variables
ENFNORMALIZ=@ENFNORMALIZ@

@videlec
Copy link
Contributor

videlec commented May 23, 2019

comment:33

Replying to @seblabbe:

The complete pynormaliz-2.5.log file is pasted on framabin here

I noticed. And this is not what I asked for.

@videlec
Copy link
Contributor

videlec commented May 23, 2019

comment:34

Replying to @seblabbe:

Replying to @mkoeppe:

It would of course be in the src subdirectory.

No config.log file in the src directory, but there is a config.py.in:

$ cd /home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pynormaliz-2.5/src
$ ls
config.py.in  doc       m4                  PyNormaliz.py  setup.py
configure     examples  NormalizModule.cpp  Readme.md      tests
COPYING       GPLv2     PKG-INFO            setup.cfg
$ cat config.py.in 
# Configuration variables
ENFNORMALIZ=@ENFNORMALIZ@

That is to be expected. The setup.py script calls $ sh configure that creates the config.py from the template file config.py.in. In your situation, the process get stuck at the $ sh configure call (as you pynormaliz-2.5.log already mentioned).

Do you have sh installed?

BTW: we should not discuss this on this close ticket... could you open a thread on sage-devel or so.

@seblabbe
Copy link
Contributor

comment:35

BTW: we should not discuss this on this close ticket... could you open a thread on sage-devel or so.

OK, let's continue here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/2virhaHdt1k/nK-AtlByBAAJ

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Jun 2, 2019

comment:36

Follow-up in #27920.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants