New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Py3: Minor enhancements in rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial.pyx #27791
Comments
Branch: u/vklein/27791 |
New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Commit: |
comment:3
I'm not sure it makes sense to sort |
comment:4
Replying to @jhpalmieri:
Does that mean even if the list comes in a different order in py2 and py3 you will get an equivalent function by reconstruction ? If this is the case what do you think is the best fix ? |
comment:5
Replying to @vinklein:
This all guesswork on my part, but I think so. The list is just giving the summands in two different orders.
says to store 0, then store 12, take a factor of y ("load 1"), take a factor of z ("load 2"), duplicate it to get two factors of z, multiply (so you have With Python 3, it starts with the summand
How about a new doctest: instead of
Since there is only one summand, there should be no issues with orderings, and I think it still illustrates the same issue. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:7
It works ! Thanks for your help. |
comment:8
Merge failed with 8.8.beta5 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
comment:10
Rebased with 8.8.beta5 which already fix the py3 doctests. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:11
Looks good to me. |
Reviewer: John Palmieri |
Changed branch from u/vklein/27791 to |
Component: python3
Author: Vincent Klein
Branch/Commit:
c532b8d
Reviewer: John Palmieri
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27791
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: