New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
q(n)-crystal on shifted primed tableaux #28141
Comments
Changed author from emarberg to Eric Marberg |
Commit: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Reviewer: Anna Schilling |
Changed reviewer from Anna Schilling to Anne Schilling |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:10
Looks good! New commits:
|
Changed keywords from none to fpsac2019 |
comment:12
No positive review with a red branch, please. |
comment:13
The merging on trac is less forgiving than on our computers. Trivial rebase. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
|
Changed branch from public/crystals/q_n_crystal_on_shifted_primed_tableaux-28141 to |
comment:17
Too late, but this :
could have been simplified to
which is faster. |
Changed commit from |
Currently crystals.ShiftedPrimedTableaux implements a gl(n)-crystal structure on shifted primed tableaux. The goal of this ticket is to upgrade this to a slightly more general q(n)-crystal structure. This involves implementing one additional set of "queer" crystal operators.
CC: @anneschilling @sagetrac-wpoh
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: fpsac2019
Author: Eric Marberg
Branch:
c53db97
Reviewer: Anne Schilling
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28141
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: