New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Readabiltiy fixes for sage-coding-theory goppa_code.py #28381
Comments
comment:3
it seems that you don't have the correct branch pushed. |
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:5
Replying to @dimpase:
Not exactly |
comment:6
Replying to @sagetrac-git:
This is just a cleaner / better readable version of the parity check generation |
comment:7
This needs to be done over current beta (beta 7), not beta 3. As you see, your branch does not merge cleanly over the current beta (it is shown in red). |
comment:8
Replying to @dimpase:
will do |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
comment:10
Replying to @dimpase:
fixed it (thanks to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3491270/git-merge-apply-changes-to-code-that-moved-to-a-different-file ) |
comment:12
Please update the ticket title to better summarize what is being improved |
comment:13
updated title |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:14
Ticket retargeted after milestone closed |
comment:15
Batch modifying tickets that will likely not be ready for 9.1, based on a review of the ticket title, branch/review status, and last modification date. |
comment:17
Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date. |
I will use this ticket to collect a few improvements I wanted to suggest for the coding theory projects goppa implementation
CC: @emes4
Component: coding theory
Branch/Commit: u/gh-927589452/coding_theory_suggestions @
c9fb9f0
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28381
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: