New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tutorial-like docstring material on RecursivelyEnumeratedSet #29882
Comments
Commit: |
Author: Florent Hivert, Sébastien Labbé |
Changed branch from u/hivert/move_searchforest_code_to_sage_sets_recursively_enumerated_set_pyx to public/29882 |
comment:4
Note that I rebased old Florent Hivert's commit on top of 9.2.beta1 (new commit hash is cb48f33). |
comment:6
I made a few small changes to try and improve the exposition. If my changes are good, then positive review. |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:7
There are a few lines which are syntax errors in Python 3:
|
comment:9
Needs review. |
comment:10
LGTM. |
Changed branch from public/29882 to |
... from a forgotten branch on #16351 ...
CC: @hivert @tscrim @seblabbe @nthiery @slel
Component: combinatorics
Author: Florent Hivert, Sébastien Labbé
Branch/Commit:
90dc326
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29882
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: