New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix product(-x, x, 1, SR.var('n')) to return (-1)^n*factorial(n) #31557
Comments
comment:1
Robert Dodier's analysis at #30520, comment 16 points to: https://github.com/andrejv/maxima/blob/5.36.0.1/share/solve_rec/solve_rec.mac#L1095-L1112 |
comment:2
I've pushed commit c584c24 on maxima-code/master to fix this bug. |
Upstream: Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:3
Thanks for fixing this and for the heads-up. This should be applied as a patch in Sage until |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:4
Adding link to commit to ticket description. |
comment:5
Oops, spoke too soon. Commit c584c24 causes a stack overflow in some other code (namely simplify_sum). Commit c584c24 has been reverted, and I'm working on an update. Sorry to say the problem isn't actually fixed yet. |
comment:6
Moving to 9.4, as 9.3 has been released. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed upstream from Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release. to Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug. |
From #30520.
Observed:
or equivalently:
Expected:
Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug.
CC: @robert-dodier @slel
Component: symbolics
Keywords: symbolic_product, maxima
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31557
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: