objects.inv contains only modules

[saraedum]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues for a bug report that matches the one I want to file, without success. (There's a meta ticket. Not sure if these are updated still: Meta-ticket: Sage docbuild #20080)

Problem Description

Currently, the objects.inv deployed at https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/objects.inv only exposes modules and documents but not classes and functions. This makes it hard to link to SageMath's documentation from other projects with intersphinx.

Here's an example that shows that the class DiscreteValuation is missing. Only it's module is around. (Same for all other classes.)

$ python -m sphinx.ext.intersphinx https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/objects.inv | grep DiscreteValuation
$ python -m sphinx.ext.intersphinx https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/objects.inv | grep discrete_valuation
	sage.categories.complete_discrete_valuation categories/sage/categories/complete_discrete_valuation.html#module-sage.categories.complete_discrete_valuation
	sage.categories.discrete_valuation       categories/sage/categories/discrete_valuation.html#module-sage.categories.discrete_valuation
	categories/sage/categories/complete_discrete_valuation Complete Discrete Valuation Rings (CDVR) and Fields (CDVF): categories/sage/categories/complete_discrete_valuation.html
	categories/sage/categories/discrete_valuation Discrete Valuation Rings (DVR) and Fields (DVF): categories/sage/categories/discrete_valuation.html

Proposed Solution

I don't understand why the objects.inv of SageMath is so short. Other projects I am working on (e.g. sage-flatsurf) produce a proper objects.inv without any special sphinx configuration.

[saraedum]

cc @videlec I tried to link to SageMath from sage-flatsurf without success because of this.