Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not doctest pbuild files in devel/sage #3562

Closed
sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin opened this issue Jul 6, 2008 · 2 comments
Closed

Do not doctest pbuild files in devel/sage #3562

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin opened this issue Jul 6, 2008 · 2 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Jul 6, 2008

Currently -tp doctests the three pbuild files

  • sagebuild.py
  • clib.py
  • build.py

Don't do it :).

I need to check if -t also picks up those files or if they are treated differently. We certainly don't doctest setup.py.

Cheers,

Michael

Component: build

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/3562

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin added this to the sage-3.0.4 milestone Jul 6, 2008
@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin self-assigned this Jul 6, 2008
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Jul 6, 2008

comment:2

I now tend to blame this on my stupidity doctesting devel/sage instead of devel/sage/sage as I should. But I am also wondering whether to add nodoctest to the three files above nonetheless to prevent accidental testing.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Jul 6, 2008

comment:3

This is invalid and just to blame on my stupidity.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin removed this from the sage-3.0.4 milestone Jul 6, 2008
@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin closed this as completed Jul 6, 2008
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants