injvar() docstring should be the same as inject_variables()

[haraldschilly]

The injvar() command has no docstring. Maybe depreciate it and use the docstring of inject_variables() ?

R = PolynomialRing( GF(Integer(2)), ['a%s'%i for i in range(Integer(93))] + ['b%s'%i for i in range(Integer(84))], order='degrevlex' )

R.injvar?
Type:           builtin_function_or_method
Base Class:     <type 'builtin_function_or_method'>
String Form:    <built-in method injvar of sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_libsingular.MPolynomialRing_libsingular object at 0xb1c32414>
Namespace:      Interactive
Docstring:
    <no docstring>
Class Docstring:
    <attribute '__doc__' of 'builtin_function_or_method' objects>

Component: algebra

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/4143

[malb]

comment:1

There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.

(http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/)

I vote for deprecation of injvar.

[jhpalmieri]

comment:2

Attachment: 4143.patch.gz

This patch deprecates injvar.

[robertwb]

comment:3

I agree with deprecating this, and the patch looks good to me.

[sagetrac-mabshoff]

comment:4

Merged in Sage 3.2.2.alpha2