New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base_ring of orders in relative number fields is wrong #4738
Comments
comment:1
Sorry, the ring of integesr of the base field of the relative number field. |
comment:2
While trying to fix this, I discovered that finding orders in relative number fields is ridiculously slow. I think pari probably will help here, either but computing it directly or by computing a basis for the absolute order and then constructing a basis for the relative order from it.
|
comment:3
The problem of the slowness of computing relative maximal orders is solved |
Branch: u/AlexGhitza/ticket/4738 |
Author: Alex Ghitza |
Commit: |
comment:11
Do we really want the maximal order of the base field? I would say the base ring should be the intersection of the relative order with the base field. In the following example, the order R in L does not contain the maximal order of K:
Note the
New commits:
|
comment:12
This would probably be fixed by implementing a coercion morphism from the base order to the relative order. However, we currently cannot construct this morphism at all:
The error probably arises because |
comment:13
The base ring should be either Z or the order intersected with the base field (which is in general not the maximal order of the base field). We have to decide which is better. |
Stopgaps: todo |
comment:17
Doctest failures. |
I think that the last ring should be the ring of integers of the relative number field.
CC: @williamstein
Component: number fields
Keywords: base ring relative number field order
Stopgaps: todo
Author: Alex Ghitza
Branch/Commit: u/AlexGhitza/ticket/4738 @
2b45932
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/4738
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: