Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

MPolynomialIdeal.reduced_basis?? returns decorator source #4958

Closed
malb opened this issue Jan 9, 2009 · 6 comments
Closed

MPolynomialIdeal.reduced_basis?? returns decorator source #4958

malb opened this issue Jan 9, 2009 · 6 comments
Assignees
@malb
Labels
c: commutative algebra p: minor / 4 t: enhancement
Milestone
sage-4.0.1

Comments

@malb
Copy link
Member

malb commented Jan 9, 2009

This problem was solved before in #4672 for another decorator.

Component: commutative algebra

Author: Martin Albrecht

Reviewer: Alex Ghitza

Merged: 4.0.1.alpha0

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/4958
@malb malb added this to the sage-4.0.1 milestone Jan 9, 2009
@malb malb self-assigned this Jan 9, 2009
@malb
Copy link
Member Author

malb commented Apr 27, 2009

Attachment: redsb_context_source.patch.gz

@aghitza
Copy link

aghitza commented May 30, 2009

comment:3

Looks good, applies to 4.0.rc2. I have tried it manually on the command line and in the notebook and it works as it should.

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

mwhansen commented Jun 1, 2009

comment:4

Merged in 4.0.1.alpha0.

@mwhansen mwhansen closed this as completed Jun 1, 2009
@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

mwhansen commented Jun 6, 2009

Reviewer: Alex Ghitza

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

mwhansen commented Jun 6, 2009

Author: Martin Albrecht

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

mwhansen commented Jun 6, 2009

Merged: 4.0.1.alpha0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@malb malb

Labels
c: commutative algebra p: minor / 4 t: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
sage-4.0.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@mwhansen @aghitza @malb