Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring plot/arrow.py to 100% coverage #6011

Closed
kcrisman opened this issue May 9, 2009 · 4 comments
Closed

Bring plot/arrow.py to 100% coverage #6011

kcrisman opened this issue May 9, 2009 · 4 comments

Comments

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

kcrisman commented May 9, 2009

Bring plot/arrow.py to 100% coverage

Component: documentation

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6011

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member Author

kcrisman commented May 9, 2009

comment:1

Attachment: trac_6011.patch.gz

Also adds tiny plot3d enhancement (original doctest only tested Graphics.plot3d).

Please see http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1adac4035031b140/c36f1f8a7c8a9b43#c36f1f8a7c8a9b43 for why there is no loads(dumps()) test. Yet.

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented May 9, 2009

Attachment: trac_6011-reviewer.patch.gz

reviewer patch; add consistency to the whole module

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented May 9, 2009

comment:3

REFEREE REPORT

The patch trac_6011.patch applies OK against the "post-final" version sage-3.4.2, all doctests pass with the options -t -long, and the doctest coverage is now 100% as claimed. Note that sage/plot/arrow.py is not included in the reference manual, so you can't search for it in order to view the documentation for sage/plot/arrow.py.

The patch adds some trivial inconsistencies in how "two-dimensional" and "three-dimensional" are abbreviated. These and other inconsistencies are fixed in the reviewer patch trac_6011-reviewer.patch. Apart from the issue of consistency throughout the whole module, positive review for kcrisman's patch. Only my patch needs to be reviewed.

@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented May 11, 2009

comment:5

Merged both patches in Sage 4.0.alpha0.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin closed this as completed May 11, 2009
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants