Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Top level README.txt is wrong reguarding Solaris #6055

Closed
sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin opened this issue May 17, 2009 · 3 comments
Closed

Top level README.txt is wrong reguarding Solaris #6055

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin opened this issue May 17, 2009 · 3 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented May 17, 2009

The top level README.txt has a few problems reguarding Solaris.

  1. It says:

SOLARIS:
It is reportedly possible, but not recommended yet (see below).
A fully supported port is planned.


But there is nothing below that.

  1. The OS is spelled as Solaris and SOLARIS. Makes searching more difficult. If you must use SOLARIS, then put 'Solaris' in a word close by. i.e, something like:

SOLARIS:
It is reportedly possible to build Sage on Solaris, but not recommended yet (see below).
A fully supported port is planned.


CC: david.kirkby@onetel.net

Component: porting: Solaris

Reviewer: David Kirkby

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6055

@qed777
Copy link
Mannequin

qed777 mannequin commented Aug 7, 2010

comment:3

Should I close this ticket as a "duplicate" of #9226?

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Apr 2, 2011

comment:4

Replying to @qed777:

Should I close this ticket as a "duplicate" of #9226?

This should indeed be closed now. It can be considered fixed by #9226 in sage-4.5.2 , though I would not call it a duplicate, as #9226 was created long after this ticket.

Dave

@jdemeyer
Copy link

jdemeyer commented Apr 5, 2011

Reviewer: David Kirkby

@jdemeyer jdemeyer removed this from the sage-4.7 milestone Apr 5, 2011
@jdemeyer jdemeyer closed this as completed Apr 5, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant