Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libgcrypt in Sage is GPL 3 #6757

Closed
sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin opened this issue Aug 16, 2009 · 4 comments
Closed

libgcrypt in Sage is GPL 3 #6757

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin opened this issue Aug 16, 2009 · 4 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Aug 16, 2009

Sage has libgcrypt version 1.4.3 in spkg/standard.

But:

http://directory.fsf.org/project/libgcrypt/

clearly shows:

1.4.3

The file SPKG.txt says:

License

  • LGPL V2.1 or later (1.4 release)

Component: cryptography

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6757

@sagetrac-drkirkby sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin added this to the sage-4.1.2 milestone Aug 16, 2009
@wdjoyner
Copy link

comment:1

See also #1627
When I download libcrypt-1.4.4 from http://www.gnupg.org/download/index.en.html#libgcrypt
the COPYING file indicates GPLv2 and the COPYING.LIB file indicates LGPLv2.1.

I don't see 1.4.3 there.

@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Aug 16, 2009

comment:2

The name of the .spkg file in Sage 4.1.1 is libgcrypt-1.4.3.p1.spkg I've made a libgcrypt-1.4.3.p2.spkg


drkirkby@smudge:[~/sage/suncc/sage-4.1.1/spkg/standard] $ ls -ld libgcrypt* 
-rw-r--r--   1 drkirkby other    2036701 Jul 31 22:45 libgcrypt-1.4.3.p1.spkg
-rw-r--r--   1 drkirkby other    2115840 Aug 16 12:34 libgcrypt-1.4.3.p2.spkg
drkirkby@smudge:[~/sage/suncc/sage-4.1.1/spkg/standard] $ pwd
/export/home/drkirkby/sage/suncc/sage-4.1.1/spkg/standard
drkirkby@smudge:[~/sage/suncc/sage-4.1.1/spkg/standard] $


@sagetrac-drkirkby
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-drkirkby mannequin commented Sep 15, 2009

comment:3

I guess we should go by the COPYING file. The website and the actual code disagree. I assume the code is more authorative.

I suspect this should be closed in that case.

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Sep 28, 2009

comment:4

I think the file COPYING in the source tarball is the authority here. So close this ticket as invalid.

@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin removed this from the sage-4.1.2 milestone Sep 28, 2009
@sagetrac-mvngu sagetrac-mvngu mannequin closed this as completed Sep 28, 2009
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant