Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tutorial: try to clarify the 'rings' section #7148

Closed
jhpalmieri opened this issue Oct 7, 2009 · 8 comments
Closed

tutorial: try to clarify the 'rings' section #7148

jhpalmieri opened this issue Oct 7, 2009 · 8 comments

Comments

@jhpalmieri
Copy link
Member

The section in the tutorial on rings can be confusing to people who aren't familiar with them, and since this precedes the material on matrices (for example), people wanting to know how to solve linear equations might be thrown off. This patch attempts to remedy this, at least partially.

This patch depends on the scripts patches at #6572 -- without them, many of the doctests here will not actually be run.

If this patch is merged, then we should open up a ticket to do the same thing to the French version of the tutorial.

Component: documentation

Author: John Palmieri

Reviewer: Mike Hansen

Merged: sage-4.2.alpha0

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7148

@jhpalmieri
Copy link
Member Author

Attachment: trac_7148-tutorial-rings.patch.gz

@jhpalmieri

This comment has been minimized.

@jhpalmieri

This comment has been minimized.

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

mwhansen commented Oct 8, 2009

comment:3

Looks good to me.

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

mwhansen commented Oct 8, 2009

Reviewer: Mike Hansen

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

Attachment: trac_7148-tutorial-rings.2.patch.gz

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

Merged: sage-4.2.alpha0

@mwhansen
Copy link
Contributor

comment:4

I had to update the patch to take care of a change from #7007.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants