You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
> I notice that in Sage 4.2, the version of sageinspect in the notebook
> doesn't match the one in sage.misc -- the one in sagenb/misc is
> missing the fix from Trac #6848. As a result,
> {{{
> RDF.random_element?
> }}}
> produces incorrect output, as noted on the ticket. Should this be
> fixed, or was the fix intentionally omitted because it uses "eval"?
For the fix, see the patch at #6848, especially the new lines 269-270 (and the associated doctest fixes).
All doctests pass, if I copy the patched sagenb.misc.sageinspect.py to $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage, say, and run sage -t sageinspect.py in that directory.
To the extent that it counts, my review is positive.
From sage-notebook:
For the fix, see the patch at #6848, especially the new lines 269-270 (and the associated doctest fixes).
CC: @williamstein
Component: notebook
Author: John Palmieri
Reviewer: Mitesh Patel, Tim Dumol
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7316
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: