Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Bipartite Graph according to 2 degree sequences #7590

Closed
nathanncohen mannequin opened this issue Dec 3, 2009 · 13 comments
Closed

Create Bipartite Graph according to 2 degree sequences #7590

nathanncohen mannequin opened this issue Dec 3, 2009 · 13 comments

Comments

@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin

nathanncohen mannequin commented Dec 3, 2009

Given the sequence of degrees for set A and a sequence of degree for set B, create the corresponding bipartite graph if possible.

This patch uses #7301 and incidentally the packages GLPK ( or CBC, but this one is under review at the moment )

CC: @wdjoyner

Component: graph theory

Work Issues: waiting on #7301

Author: Nathann Cohen

Reviewer: Robert Miller

Merged: sage-4.3.1.alpha2

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7590

@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin added this to the sage-4.3.1 milestone Dec 3, 2009
@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin assigned rlmill Dec 3, 2009
@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Dec 4, 2009

comment:1

Here it is !

@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin added the s: needs review label Dec 4, 2009
@nathanncohen

This comment has been minimized.

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Dec 15, 2009

comment:3

What is the status of #7301 and this patch? The comments on #7301 are a bit confusing, but at the end it seems as if perhaps this patch should depend on the other version instead of #7301?

@rlmill rlmill mannequin added s: needs info and removed s: needs review labels Dec 15, 2009
@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Dec 16, 2009

comment:4

Well, I'd say this patch is ready for review (as it is written and functional) even though #7301 is not :-)

The discussion in #7301 could lead to a gale_ryser function which does not use GLPK ( and may be even more efficient ), which is good for everybody :-)

As this function is not so fundamental to Sage, I see no harm in making it wait until #7301 is ready :-)

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Dec 16, 2009

comment:5

Attachment: trac_7590.patch.gz

Added # optional to some doctests.

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Dec 16, 2009

Reviewer: Robert Miller

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Dec 16, 2009

Author: Nathann Cohen

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Dec 16, 2009

Work Issues: waiting on #7301

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Dec 16, 2009

comment:7

(This is fine by me once #7301 is ready...)

@rlmill rlmill mannequin added s: needs review and removed s: needs work labels Jan 13, 2010
@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Jan 13, 2010

comment:9

positive review.

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Jan 13, 2010

Merged: 4.3.1.alpha2

@rlmill rlmill mannequin removed the s: needs review label Jan 13, 2010
@rlmill rlmill mannequin closed this as completed Jan 13, 2010
@nathanncohen
Copy link
Mannequin Author

nathanncohen mannequin commented Jan 13, 2010

comment:10

Thanks !! :-)

@sagetrac-mvngu
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mvngu mannequin commented Jan 13, 2010

Changed merged from 4.3.1.alpha2 to sage-4.3.1.alpha2

@nathanncohen nathanncohen mannequin mentioned this issue Jan 13, 2010
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants