New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvements to AGM #7739
Comments
comment:1
Look basically good. Robert, do you want to add the test for a=0 or b=0 or a=-b in the complex_double case, and also perhaps a=0 or b=0 for the real cases? |
comment:2
Attachment: 7739-cdfrdf-agm.patch.gz Good idea, I added some degenerate tests and refreshed the patch. |
Attachment: 7739-cdfrdf-agm.2.patch.gz corrects typo in previous patch (which it replaces) |
comment:3
There's a typo (sgm for agm) in the docstring (line 1944 of complex_double). I edited the patch to fix that. Otherwise I'm quite happy -- applies to 4.3 and tests in sage/rings/{real,complex}* all pass. So: positive review! |
Reviewer: John Cremona |
Merged: 4.3.1.alpha2 |
Author: Robert Bradshaw |
Changed merged from 4.3.1.alpha2 to sage-4.3.1.alpha2 |
comment:6
Thanks. |
Native (much faster) agm for RDF and CDF, optimized and document agm for RR.
Inspired by, but somewhat orthogonal to, #7719.
CC: @JohnCremona
Component: basic arithmetic
Author: Robert Bradshaw
Reviewer: John Cremona
Merged: sage-4.3.1.alpha2
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7739
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: