New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add Pollack/Stevens overconvergent modular symbols code #812
Comments
comment:3
Craig, I know I must be bothering you by now, but what is the status here? Cheers, Michael |
comment:4
Could somebody post a link to the Magma code here? |
comment:5
Sure, |
comment:6
From Jennifer Balakrishnan: Rob Pollack just ported over some of his p-adic L-series via The code he sent me originally didn't quite produce results matching Here's where the code currently stands: As an enhancement, maybe we could also use some of your very fast code Perhaps most mathematically interesting, the special values computed The code is available here: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jen/OMS To run it, attach master.sage and Jen/test_run_generic.sage. The Jen |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Commit: |
New commits:
|
comment:10
I think the code is usable enough that it should made into Sage. It includes the btquotients code, which is in a quite stable state as well. Several parts of the code are in need for more debugging, though. Especially the dist.pyx and distributions.py, which are not very robust. |
comment:11
There are some failing doctests, see patchbot's report |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:13
OK, I just learned that: So hopefully now it works! |
comment:14
I just (very) quickly skimmed the patches -- this is some beautiful code! |
comment:16
Just some general "top-level" remarks, without really looking at the code yet:
|
comment:17
Hi Marc, |
comment:18
patchbot:
|
comment:94
To me all tests still pass and I can't check 32-bit or optional magma. So I set this to positive review, fearing of course that a bot or vbraun will find yet another issue. The patchbot complains about something, but I don't understand it. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1 and set ticket back to needs_review. New commits:
|
comment:96
I realized that there was one doctest missing in |
comment:97
Well, you deleted lots of commented code and moved an undocumented function to a place where coverage won't complain about it. I guess this is not the optimal solutions, but one can deal with this in #20863. Coverage also complains about another missing docstring:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:99
I fixed the missing doctest in New commits:
|
comment:100
tests pass. |
comment:101
Building the pdf docs fails
|
Changed branch from u/mmasdeu/812-pollackstevens to u/wuthrich/ticket/812 |
comment:102
pdf documentation now build for me. Last 10 new commits:
|
Changed branch from u/wuthrich/ticket/812 to |
I'm just starting to work on implementing Pollack & Stevens' methods for using overconvergent modular symbols for p-adic L-functions, Stark-Heegner points, etc.
CC: @loefflerd @roed314 @craigcitro @categorie
Component: modular forms
Keywords: p-adic L-functions
Author: Marc Masdeu, David Roe
Branch/Commit:
44c321f
Reviewer: Chris Wuthrich
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/812
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: