New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug in conjugate of symbolic ring #8775
Comments
Upstream: Not yet reported upstream; Will do shortly. |
comment:1
From Burcin Erocal on the same thread:
I'm changing this to "not yet reported upstream". |
comment:2
Changing upstream report - too early for feedback at this point. |
Changed upstream from Not yet reported upstream; Will do shortly. to Reported upstream. Little or no feedback. |
add doctests |
Author: Burcin Erocal |
Changed keywords from none to pynac |
comment:3
Attachment: trac_8775-conjugate.patch.gz This is fixed by the new pynac package at #8903. attachment: trac_8775-conjugate.patch contains doctest fixes. Note that the new pynac version also fixes #8542, #8651, and #8688. Patches from these tickets should be applied before running doctests. |
comment:4
For some reason, although Sage 4.4.4.alpha0 has pynac-0.2.0.p3
Did this change not end up making it into the Pynac package after all? According to http://pynac.sagemath.org/hg/rev/60acd6985820, it should be in there, but now I find it hard to explain the above. |
comment:5
Replying to @kcrisman:
That patched was backed out since it caused some problems with doctests in I merged the upstream patch from GiNaC fixing this problem in the latest version of pynac. I will upload a new patch with doctest fixes later. |
apply only this patch |
comment:6
Attachment: trac_8775-conjugate.take2.patch.gz I uploaded a new patch to add doctests for the fixes in Pynac. Only attachment: trac_8775-conjugate.take2.patch should be applied. This depends on #9901. |
Changed upstream from Reported upstream. Little or no feedback. to none |
comment:7
The issue seems to be solved. I have tried other examples and it works as expected. The doctest passes. |
Reviewer: Luis Felipe Tabera |
comment:8
There is a typo in the ticket number in the commit message :-) |
Same patch with fixed commit message |
Merged: sage-4.6.1.alpha1 |
comment:9
Attachment: trac_8775-conjugate-fixed-message.patch.gz |
Changed reviewer from Luis Felipe Tabera to Luis Felipe Tabera Alonso |
From http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/9f941378a95c0191:
Could this be related to #6244? Anyway, presumably conjugate should remain unevaluated on this sort of thing, while still being evaluated on things like a+I or 33.
Component: symbolics
Keywords: pynac
Author: Burcin Erocal
Reviewer: Luis Felipe Tabera Alonso
Merged: sage-4.6.1.alpha1
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/8775
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: