New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
desolve fails when assumptions required #8931
Comments
comment:1
I have the same problem solving a different equation:
returns
The only quick workaround I have found is to specify the values of the constants, but I really need them to be symbolic. The best I can do is use primes for values of constants and after several such sets you can get a picture of how the constants are related to the numbers in the solution terms, but it's an ass-ache. I think the best solution would be to have an optional argument to desolve which answers the question posed if there are not sufficient assumptions/conditions to already determine the correct answer. Really appreciate the great work so far guys! :D |
comment:2
with #9835
|
Attachment: trac_8931_doctest.patch.gz |
comment:3
The patch adds a doc test for this issue. |
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman |
Changed author from G.Connan to Flavia Stan |
comment:5
Applies cleanly to 4.7.alpha1, passes tests, clearly fixes the issue, looks good in the documentation. Positive review. Not sure what to do on the author; fstan is the person I have put, as the person who posted the patch, but before it had G. Cannon. Unless fstan comments on this, let's leave her as the author. |
Merged: sage-4.7.alpha4 |
I want to solve f''/f=k with k in R
and sage keeps answering :
so I tried :
and I got :
!!
CC: @robert-marik @kcrisman
Component: symbolics
Keywords: desolve
Author: Flavia Stan
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman
Merged: sage-4.7.alpha4
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/8931
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: