New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better latex for quadratic fields #9018
Comments
Attachment: 9018-quadratic-latex.patch.gz |
comment:1
Depends on #9017. |
Attachment: trac_9018_reviewer_patch.patch.gz To apply after 9018-quadratic-latex.patch |
comment:2
This is all fine, apart from two trivial things: a revised doctest, and a style change to a docstring. Both are included in the reviewer patch. |
sagetrac-fwclarke
mannequin
added
s: positive review
and removed
s: needs review
labels
May 23, 2010
Author: Robert Bradshaw |
Reviewer: Francis Clarke |
Merged: sage-4.4.4.alpha0 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
By default, things could print as a+b\sqrt{D}
Component: number fields
Author: Robert Bradshaw
Reviewer: Francis Clarke
Merged: sage-4.4.4.alpha0
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9018
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: