New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve doctest coverage of databases/conway.py #9222
Comments
Author: Alex Ghitza |
comment:2
After the patch:
I'm not convinced a |
comment:3
Looks fine to me. Tests pass and the documentation builds OK. I agree that the _init method isn't something one can reasonably doctest! |
Reviewer: David Loeffler |
comment:5
Please include ticket numbers in the commit strings of your patches! |
comment:6
Attachment: trac_9222.patch.gz Done. |
Merged: sage-4.5.2.alpha1 |
comment:7
Replying to @aghitza:
Thanks! |
As of sage-4.4.3:
CC: @sagetrac-mvngu
Component: doctest coverage
Keywords: conway polynomial database
Author: Alex Ghitza
Reviewer: David Loeffler
Merged: sage-4.5.2.alpha1
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9222
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: