This test was failing on my Windows machine, due to the calculation f…

…inishing before the timeout.

This is possibly due in part to the abort timer being a bit 'slower' to go off on Cygwin due to Cygwin overheads.
Changing this to a much larger calculation pretty much guarantees the test to pass though--just need to make
absolute sure the timeout works ''correctly'' :)

src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py

@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
 Here is an example or how to deal with timeout::
 
     sage: from sage.parallel.map_reduce import RESetMPExample, AbortError
-    sage: EX = RESetMPExample(maxl = 8)
+    sage: EX = RESetMPExample(maxl = 100)
     sage: try:
     ....:     res = EX.run(timeout=0.01)
     ....: except AbortError:
@@ -225,6 +225,7 @@
 
 The following should not timeout even on a very slow machine::
 
+    sage: EX = RESetMPExample(maxl = 8)
     sage: try:
     ....:     res = EX.run(timeout=60)
     ....: except AbortError:
@@ -1379,6 +1380,7 @@ def run(self,
         Here is an example or how to deal with timeout::
 
             sage: from sage.parallel.map_reduce import AbortError
+            sage: EX = RESetMPExample(maxl = 100)
             sage: try:
             ....:     res = EX.run(timeout=0.01)
             ....: except AbortError:
@@ -1391,6 +1393,7 @@ def run(self,
         The following should not timeout even on a very slow machine::
 
             sage: from sage.parallel.map_reduce import AbortError
+            sage: EX = RESetMPExample(maxl = 8)
             sage: try:
             ....:     res = EX.run(timeout=60)
             ....: except AbortError: