Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

standardize a way to configure feature toggles #76

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 1, 2016
Merged

standardize a way to configure feature toggles #76

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 1, 2016

Conversation

iamigo
Copy link
Contributor

@iamigo iamigo commented Oct 31, 2016

No description provided.

@iamigo iamigo closed this Oct 31, 2016
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 83.159% when pulling 34b8d7f on feature-toggles into e12f31e on master.

@iamigo iamigo reopened this Oct 31, 2016
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 83.115% when pulling 79ff549 on feature-toggles into e12f31e on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 83.115% when pulling 79ff549 on feature-toggles into e12f31e on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 83.202% when pulling cefe32a on feature-toggles into 9e81570 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 83.115% when pulling 8835a71 on feature-toggles into beb200d on master.

@pallavi2209 pallavi2209 merged commit 11c1b3d into master Nov 1, 2016
@iamigo iamigo deleted the feature-toggles branch November 1, 2016 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pallavi2209 pallavi2209 pallavi2209 approved these changes

@shriramshankar shriramshankar shriramshankar approved these changes

Assignees

@pallavi2209 pallavi2209

@shriramshankar shriramshankar

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@iamigo @coveralls @pallavi2209 @shriramshankar