Another way for transpiling TypeScript #522
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I've added support directly through configuration for next major version #521, but this is also a way... |
dolezel
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2019
* Alternative for transpiling (#522) * Support for TS migrations * Typing for shorthands * Fixed lint * Checks in custom migration
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TypeScript can be transpiled without creating a
migrate.jsfile.Also it's worth mentioning again how to manage migrations sitting in a custom folder, since it's very likely to happen when using TypeScript.
I personally like this configuration, what do you think?