Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove 4.2 support #155

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 25, 2017
Merged

Remove 4.2 support #155

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 25, 2017

Conversation

elrayle
Copy link
Contributor

@elrayle elrayle commented Sep 25, 2017

  • update gemspec to require at least Rails 5.0
  • update Travis to test Rails 5.0 and 5.1

README.md Outdated
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ Commit your features into a new branch and submit a pull request.

## Compatibility

Currently, it is compatible with Rails 4.0 and 4.1 under both Ruby 2.0 and 2.1.
Currently, it is compatible with Rails 5.0 and 5.1 under both Ruby 2.4.1.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add Ruby 2.3 to the test matrix and to this README?

Otherwise, remove the word "both"

qa.gemspec Outdated
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |s|
s.files = Dir["{app,config,db,lib}/**/*", "LICENSE", "Rakefile", "README.md"]
s.test_files = Dir["spec/**/*"]

s.add_dependency "rails", ">= 4.2.0", "< 6.0"
s.add_dependency "rails", "~> 5.0", "< 6.0"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove "< 6.0" as redundant?

Copy link
Member

@no-reply no-reply left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Glad to have all this up to date.

@elrayle elrayle merged commit 1f57573 into master Sep 25, 2017
@elrayle elrayle deleted the remove_4.2_support branch September 25, 2017 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants