Fix bug in which samples to correct peaks for energy calibration.

Previously, for multi-record files, was checking if all the affected sample numbers were in the peaks samples numbers.  But now checks for all the peaks sample numbers, that they are being energy adjusted (an inversion of check).

InterSpec/EnergyCalTool.h

@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ enum class MoreActionsIndex : int
   NumMoreActionsIndex
 };//enum MoreActionsIndex
 
-/** A struct that indicates what SpecUtils::Measurement's to apply a coefficent change to.
-  \TODO: if (or hopefully when) the InterSpec class allows selecting detectors seperately for
+/** A struct that indicates what SpecUtils::Measurement's to apply a coefficient change to.
+  \TODO: if (or hopefully when) the InterSpec class allows selecting detectors separately for
          foreground/back/sec., we will need to consider upgrading how we indicate things \
          because there is an edge-case where detectors wanted will differ by sample number
  
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ class EnergyCalTool : public Wt::WContainerWidget
   std::string applyToSummaryTxt() const;
 
   /** Returns which SpecUtils::Measurement need to be updated, based on what files are loaded and
-   what options the user has choosen.
+   what options the user has chosen.
    */
   std::vector<MeasToApplyCoefChangeTo> measurementsToApplyCoeffChangeTo();
 

src/EnergyCalTool.cpp

@@ -2600,8 +2600,14 @@ void EnergyCalTool::applyCalChange( std::shared_ptr<const SpecUtils::EnergyCalib
     for( const set<int> &samples : samples_with_peaks )
     {
       bool all_samples = true;
-      for( const int sample : change.sample_numbers )
-        all_samples = (all_samples && samples.count(sample));
+
+      // Check if the peaks sample numbers are all getting re-calibrated
+      for( auto sample_num_iter = begin(samples);
+          all_samples && (sample_num_iter != end(samples));
+          ++sample_num_iter )
+      {
+        all_samples = (change.sample_numbers.count(*sample_num_iter) != 0u);
+      }
 
       if( all_samples )
         peaksamples.insert( samples );
@@ -2610,8 +2616,14 @@ void EnergyCalTool::applyCalChange( std::shared_ptr<const SpecUtils::EnergyCalib
     for( const set<int> &samples : samples_with_hint_peaks )
     {
       bool all_samples = true;
-      for( const int sample : change.sample_numbers )
-        all_samples = (all_samples && samples.count(sample));
+
+      // Check if the peaks sample numbers are all getting re-calibrated
+      for( auto sample_num_iter = begin(samples);
+          all_samples && (sample_num_iter != end(samples));
+          ++sample_num_iter )
+      {
+        all_samples = (change.sample_numbers.count(*sample_num_iter) != 0u);
+      }
 
       if( all_samples )
         hintPeakSamples.insert( samples );