-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
SAX2JavaBinding
the package jlibs.xml.sax.binding contains classes which help you to read xml and create java objects.
Before going into details, we will first go through the concepts. Then it will be easier to understand the code.
we have employee.xml:
<employee>
<name>scott</name>
<age>20</age>
<experience>5</experience>
</employee>
and Employee class:
public class Employee{
private String name;
private int age;
private int experience;
// getter and setter methods
}
Each element in xml will create a java object. Let us see the java objects created for above xml:
XML | Java Object
--------------------------------|-----------------
<employee> | new Employee()
<name>scott</name> | new String(#text)
<age>20</age> | new String(#text)
<experience>5</experience> | new String(#text)
</employee> |
From above table you can see that:
-
<employe/>element create newEmployeeobject
-
<name/>,<age/>and<experience/>elements createStringobjects with their text content(i.e#text)
Now we have 4 java Objects ( one Employee object and four String objects)
Now relation comes into picture. Each element has a relation which tells how to relate current element's java object with parent element's java oject.
XML | Java Object | Relation
--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------
<employee> | emp = new Employee() | - No Relation -
<name>scott</name> | name = new String(#text) | emp.setName(name)
<age>20</age> | age = new String(#text) | emp.setAge(age)
<experience>5</experience> | exp = new String(#text) | emp.setExperience(exp)
</employee> |
The above table shows how java objects created are related with each other.
To make understanding easier, we assigned each java object created into some variable.
-
Employeeobject created is assigned toempvariable
-
Stringcreated for<name>element is assigned tonamevariable
-
Stringcreated for<age>element is assigned toagevariable
-
Stringcreated for<experience>element is assigned toexpvariable
Now you can see that relation of <name> element and its parent element <employee> in java is:
emp.setName(name)
Once Java-Object and Relation are defined for each element type, It is piece of cake to read xml document into java objects.
import jlibs.xml.sax.binding.*;
@Binding("employee")
public class EmployeeBinding{
@Binding.Start
public static Employee onStart() throws SAXException{
return new Employee();
}
@Binding.Text({"name", "age", "experience"})
public static String onText(String text){
return text;
}
@Relation.Finish("name")
public static void relateName(Employee employee, String name){
employee.setName(name);
}
@Relation.Finish("age")
public static void relateAge(Employee employee, String age){
employee.setAge(Integer.parseInt(age));
}
@Relation.Finish("experience")
public static void relateExperience(Employee employee, String experience){
employee.setExperience(Integer.parseInt(experience));
}
}
Let us walk through the code:
import jlibs.xml.sax.binding.*;
package jlibs.xml.sax.binding contains various annotations, which we use to define binding.
@Binding("employee")
public class EmployeeBinding{
@Binding("employee") annotation says that, EmployeeBinding class defines binding for <employee> element
@Binding.Start
public static Employee onStart() throws SAXException{
return new Employee();
}
@Binding.Start annotation says that, when <employee> element starts call this method.
this method returns new Employee object. i.e for each <employee> we create an Employee object.
@Binding.Text({"name", "age", "experience"})
public static String onText(String text){
return text;
}
@Binding.Text({"name", "age", "experience"}) annotation says that, call this method for <name>, <age> and <employee> text content.
The argument text will be the text content of that element. The java object created for these elements is their text
content, so we simply return the text argument.
@Relation.Finish("name")
public static void relateName(Employee employee, String name){
employee.setName(name);
}
@Relation.Finish("name") annotation says that, call this method on <name> element end.
The first argument will be the java object created for <name>'s parent element (i,e <employee> element), which is Employee object created by onStart() method.
The second argument will be the java object created for <name> element, which is String object created by onText(...) method.
similarly relateAge(...) and relateExperience(...) are called on <age> and <experience> element end respectively.
Now we have finished coding
EmployeeBinding. Now let us see how to read employee xml document using this binding.public static Employee read(File xmlFile) throws Exception{
BindingHandler handler = new BindingHandler(EmployeeBinding.class);
return (Employee)handler.parse(new InputSource(xmlFile.getPath()));
}
BindingHandler is an implementation of SAX DefaultHandler. It's constructor takes the binding calss as argument.
Let us see what happens behind the scene.
All the annoations we have used have RetentionPolicy.SOURCE(except @Binding). i.e These annotations are not available at runtime.
JLibs comes with an annotation processor,
which processes these annotations at compile time.
This processor generates a class for each class with @Binding annotation.
This generated class defines the state diagram for the binding.
for example when you compile EmployeeBinding class, you will get an additional class EmployeeBindingImpl generated.
BindingHandler is a SAX DefaultHandler which implements a state machine.
Because reflection is not used at runtime, the sax parsing will be faster.
let us say employee.xml is:
<employee>
<name>scott</name>
<age>20</age>
<experience>5</experience>
<email>scott@email.com</email>
</employee>
The above xml document has an unexpected element <email> for which we have not defined any binding.
When you read the above xml document using EmployeeBinding, it simply ignores the undefinded element <email>.
i.e you will be able to create Employee object from the above xml document without any errors.
Suppose you want to issue an error for undefined elements then do:
handler.setIgnoreUnresolved(false); // default is true
now when you try to read the above xml document, you will get following exception:
org.xml.sax.SAXException: can't find binding for /employee/email (line=5, col=12)
Have a look at Company class:
public class Company{
private String name;
private Employee manager;
public List<Employee> employees = new ArrayList<Employee>();
// getter and setter methods
}
and company.xml as below:
XML | Java Object | Relation
-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------
<company name="foo"> | company = new Company(@name) |
<manager> | manager = /*use EmployeeBinding*/ |
<name>admin</name> | |
<age>30</age> | |
<experience>7</experience> | |
</manager> | | company.setManager(manager)
<employee> | employee = /*use EmployeeBinding*/|
<name>scott</name> | |
<age>20</age> | |
<experience>5</experience> | |
</employee> | | company.addEmployee(employee)
<employee> | employee = /*use EmployeeBinding*/|
<name>alice</name> | |
<age>21</age> | |
<experience>4</experience> | |
</employee> | | company.addEmployee(employee)
</company> | |
on <company> element begin, we create Company object.
for <manager> and <employee> elements we will create Employee objects, using EmployeeBinding coded earlier.
on <manager> element end, we relate company and manager objects using setManager(...) method
on <employee> element end, we relate company and employee objects using addEmployee(...) method
Let us implmennt CompanyBinding:
@Binding("company")
public class CompanyBinding{
@Binding.Start
public static Company onStart(@Attr String name) throws SAXException{
return new Company(name);
}
@Binding.Element(element = "manager", clazz = EmployeeBinding.class)
public static void onManager(){}
@Relation.Finish("manager")
public static void relateManager(Company company, Employee manager){
company.setManager(manager);
}
@Binding.Element(element = "employee", clazz = EmployeeBinding.class)
public static void onEmployee(){}
@Relation.Finish("employee")
public static void relateEmployee(Company company, Employee employee){
company.employees.add(employee);
}
}
Let us walk through the code:
@Binding.Start
public static Company onStart(@Attr String name) throws SAXException{
return new Company(name);
}
@Attr annotation is used to get attribute value.
the attribute name is derived from the parameter name.
i.e, @Attr String name will give value of attribute name
in some cases, attribute name may not be valid java identifier.
for example param-name is a valid attribute name, but not a valid java identifier.
in such cases you can do:
@Attr("param-name") String paramName
@Binding.Element(element = "manager", clazz = EmployeeBinding.class)
public static void onManager(){}
@Binding.Element(element = "manager", clazz = EmployeeBinding.class) annotation says to reuse EmployeeBinding for <manager> element.
@NamespaceContext({
@Entry(prefix="foo", uri="http://www.foo.com"),
@Entry(prefix="bar", uri="http://www.bar.com")
})
@Binding("foo:employee")
public class EmployeeBinding{
...
}
@NamespaceContext annotation is used to define prefix to namespace mappings.
then you can use these prefixes in remaining annotations. for example:
@Binding("foo:employee")
Let us say our Employee has no default constructor:
public class Employee{
private String name;
private int age;
private int experience;
public Employee(String name, int age, int experience){
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.experience = experience;
}
// getter methods
}
Let us see how to handle this situation:
XML | Java Object | Relation
--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------
<employee> | |
<name>scott</name> | name = new String(#text) | parent[<name>] = name
<age>20</age> | age = new String(#text) | parent[<age>] = age
<experience>5</experience> | exp = new String(#text) | parent[<experience>] = exp
</employee> | emp = new Employee(current[<name>], current[<age>], [<experience>]) |
Notice that now we are creating Employee object in <employee> element end, rather than <employee> element begin.
This is because, the values of name, age and experience are available only on <employee> element end.
Earlier, the relation for <name>, <age> and <experience> used to call respective set method on Employee object.
Now we can't do that, because we don't have Employee created by that time.
For each element in xml document, a SAXContext is maintained by BindingHandler.
This context is used to store the java object you created for that element.
SAXContext.object gives the object you have created.
Other than that, SAXContext also has map, which you can use to store values temporarly which are required to create the java object later.
SAXContext.temp is that map. here key is QName and value is any Object.
let us see the relation for <name> element:
parent[<name>] = name
here parent refers to parent element's (i,e <employee>) context;
we are storing the String object created for <name> element, in <employee>'s context.
here the key used is the qname name of current element i.e <name>
similarly we are saving the values of <age> and <experience> elements also in <employees>'s context.
now on <employee> element end we do:
emp = new Employee(current[<name>], current[<age>], [<experience>])
here current refers to current element's (i.e <employee>) context;
we are retriving the values of <name>, <age> and <experience> stored earlier, and creating Employee object using them.
Let us see what it looks like in java code:
@Binding("employee")
public class EmployeeBinding{
@Binding.Text({"name", "age", "experience"})
public static String onText(String text){
return text;
}
@Relation.Finish({"name", "age", "experience"})
public static String relateWithEmployee(String value){
return value;
}
@Binding.Finish
public static Employee onFinish(@Temp String name, @Temp String age, @Temp String experience) throws SAXException{
return new Employee(name,
Integer.parseInt(age==null ? "0" : age),
Integer.parseInt(experience==null ? "0" : experience)
);
}
}
Let us walk through the code;
@Relation.Finish({"name", "age", "experience"})
public static String relateWithEmployee(String value){
return value;
}
@Relation.Finish({"name", "age", "experience"}) annotation says that, call this method on
<name>, <age> and <experience> element end.
When a method with relation annotation returns something:
- the returned value is stored in parent element's temp with current element's qname as key
- the first argument will be the object created for the current element.
i.e String value is the String object created for current element.
and the value returned is stored in <employee> element's temp.
@Binding.Finish
public static Employee onFinish(@Temp String name, @Temp String age, @Temp String experience) throws SAXException{
return new Employee(name,
Integer.parseInt(age==null ? "0" : age),
Integer.parseInt(experience==null ? "0" : experience)
);
}
@Binding.Finish annotation says that, call this method on <employee> element end.
@Temp String name says that give me the value mapped to name in current element's temp.
similar to @Attr you can explicitly specify the qname as follows:
@Temp("name") String employeeName
Here in onFinish(...) method, we are creating Employee` object using the values that are stored earlier in temp, and returning it.
Let us say we have
Component class:public class Component{
public final String name;
public Properties initParams = new Properties();
public List<Component> dependencies = new ArrayList<Component>();
public Component(String name){
this.name = name;
}
}
- name
- init params
- dependencies (list of components) i.e, we have recursion
Let us see sample xml:
XML | Java Object | Relation
----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------
<component name="comp1"> | comp = new Company(@name) |
<init-param> | |
<param-name>param1</param-name> | paramName = #text | parent[<param-name>] = paramName
<param-value>value1</param-value> | paramValue = #text | parent[<param-value>] = paramValue
</init-param> | comp.initParams.put(current[<param-name>], current[<param-value>]) |
<init-param> | |
<param-name>param2</param-name> | |
<param-value>value2</param-value> | |
</init-param> | |
<dependencies> | |
<component name="comp2"> | dependent = /* use Recursion */ |
<init-param> | |
<param-name>param3</param-name> | |
<param-value>value3</param-value> | |
</init-param> | |
<dependencies> | |
<component name="comp3"> | |
<init-param> | |
<param-name>param4</param-name> | |
<param-value>value4</param-value> | |
</init-param> | |
</component> | |
</dependencies> | |
</component> | | comp.dependencies.add(dependent)
</dependencies> | |
</component> | |
here we have recursion. comp1 depends on comp2 which in turn depends on comp3
let us the Binding implementation:
@Binding("component")
public class ComponentBinding{
@Binding.Start
public static Component onStart(@Attr String name){
return new Component(name);
}
@Binding.Text({ "init-param/param-name", "init-param/param-value" })
public static String onParamNameAndValue(String text){
return text;
}
@Relation.Finish({"init-param/param-name", "init-param/param-value"})
public static String relateParamNameAndValue(String content){
return content;
}
@Relation.Finish("init-param")
public static void relateParam(Component comp, @Temp("param-name") String paramName, @Temp("param-value") String paramValue){
comp.initParams.put(paramName, paramValue);
}
@Binding.Element(element="dependencies/component", clazz=ComponentBinding.class)
public static void onDependecy(){}
@Relation.Finish("dependencies/component")
public static void relateDependency(Component comp, Component dependent){
comp.dependencies.add(dependent);
}
}
public class Employee{
public String name;
public int age;
public int experience;
public String contacts[];
public Employee(String name, int age, int experience){
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.experience = experience;
}
}
XML | Java Object | Relation
------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------
<employee name="scott" age="20" experience="5"> | emp = new Employee(@name, @age, @experience) |
<contacts> | |
<email>scott@yahoo.com</email> | email = #text | parent[<email>] += email
<email>scott@google.com</email> | email = #text | parent[<email>] += email
<email>scott@msn.com</email> | email = #text | parent[<email>] += email
</contacts> | | emp.contacts = current[<email>]
</employee> | |
notice that the relation for <email> element end is:
parent[<email>] += email
here '+=' means add to temp (i.e don't replace existing value)
that is, parent[<email>] value is a list of strings rather than string
the relation for <contacts> element end is:
emp.contacts = parent[<email>]
i.e we are assigning the list of emails from current element's temp int emp.conctacts
Let us see the java code:
@Binding("employee")
public class EmployeeBinding{
@Binding.Start
public static Employee onStart(@Attr String name, @Attr String age, @Attr String experience){
return new Employee(name,
age!=null ? Integer.parseInt(age) : 0,
experience!=null ? Integer.parseInt(experience) : 0
);
}
@Binding.Text("contacts/email")
public static String onText(String text){
return text;
}
@Relation.Finish("contacts/email")
public static @Temp.Add String relateEmail(String email){
return email;
}
@Binding.Finish("contacts")
public static void onFinish(Employee emp, @Temp("email") List<String> emails){
emp.contacts = emails.toArray(new String[emails.size()]);
}
}
let us walk through the code:
@Relation.Finish("contacts/email")
public static @Temp.Add String relateEmail(String email){
return email;
}
@Temp.Add on return type says that, add the returned value to the existing value.
i.e we want to save it as list of emails
@Binding.Finish("contacts")
public static void onFinish(Employee emp, @Temp("email") List<String> emails){
if(emails!=null)
emp.contacts = emails.toArray(new String[emails.size()]);
}
notice the second argument. It is mapped to @Temp("email") and its type is List<String>
Most of java-xml binding implementations provide two way support.
- serializing domain object to xml
- serializing xml to domain object.
But JLibs implementation is only one way. that is "deserializing xml to domain object".
to serialize xml to domain object, you can use XMLDocument
the main advantages of JLibs implementation:
- works with hand-coded domain objects
most binding implementations mandate that domain objects has to be generated
from schema or dtd. They don't work with hand-coded domain objects
- domain objects are not tied to binding implementation
domain objects dont need to extend/implement a particular class/interface from binding implementation.
for example,
- XMLBeans mandates that all domain objects implement
org.apache.xmlbeans.XmlObject
- Similarly EMF mandates that all domain objects implement
EObjectinterface
- domain objects are light-weight. i.e not poluted with binding implementation specific information
for example: the domain objects created by XMLBeans or EMF carry lot of information which are specific
to them. This will bloat up memory.
- easier migration.
let us say in version 2 of your project, you want to change the structure of xml how it looks like, and still wants to provide backward
compatibility to end-users.
This is tedious task with other binding frameworks. With JLibs you can have different Binding implementations
for a domain object and use appropriate one at runtime based on version of xml document.
- clear separation of binding and domain object
- in jlibs, it is like a callback methods.
callback methods can define when it has to be called and what information from xml document you want.
You have complete control how to consume that information into domain object (because you are implementing it in java code)
- The runtime memory used by jlibs binding is minimal and no reflection api is used. The number of
SAXContextis equal to the maximum element depth of the xml document.
JLibs binding implementation more of resembels Apache's Commons-Digestor but without reflection