bpmn unit testing fixes #1140
bpmn unit testing fixes #1140
Conversation
…t process initiator user
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent update enhances the functionality of the backend by refining method management and test runner configurations. Specifically, it merges additional method overrides into existing ones and adjusts the setup for BPMN process instances in tests. Additionally, it corrects a typo in a class name, improving clarity and consistency across the codebase. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Files selected for processing (2)
- spiffworkflow-backend/src/spiffworkflow_backend/services/process_instance_processor.py (2 hunks)
- spiffworkflow-backend/src/spiffworkflow_backend/services/process_model_test_runner_service.py (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
spiffworkflow-backend/src/spiffworkflow_backend/services/process_model_test_runner_service.py (3)
- 17-17: The addition of the import statement for
ProcessInstanceProcessoris appropriate and aligns with the PR's objective to enhance script engine integration for BPMN unit testing. This import is crucial for the subsequent modifications in the instantiation ofbpmn_process_instancewhere the script engine settings and method overrides are applied.- 125-135: The modifications to the instantiation of
bpmn_process_instanceinclude setting the script engine toProcessInstanceProcessor._default_script_engineand defining method overrides forget_process_initiator_user. This approach effectively integrates the script engine and allows for the customization of method behavior during testing, which is essential for achieving the PR's objectives. However, it's important to ensure thatProcessInstanceProcessor._default_script_engineis properly configured to support these overrides without affecting other parts of the system.Additionally, the use of a lambda function for
get_process_initiator_useris a clever way to mock the behavior of this method for testing purposes. It's crucial, however, to verify that this mock returns data that is representative of what would be expected in a real scenario to ensure test accuracy.
- 463-463: The correction of the class name from
ProcessModeltTestRunnerBackendDelegatetoProcessModelTestRunnerBackendDelegateis a minor but important fix for code quality and readability. Such typos can lead to confusion and errors in code usage, so addressing them contributes positively to the maintainability of the codebase.spiffworkflow-backend/src/spiffworkflow_backend/services/process_instance_processor.py (2)
- 369-371: The integration of
method_overridesinto the script engine's_evaluatemethod is correctly implemented. This change allows for dynamic method overriding, which can be particularly useful in testing scenarios or when custom behavior is needed for specific tasks. The use of dictionary unpacking to mergemethodsandself.method_overridesis both efficient and readable.- 395-397: Similarly, the addition of
method_overridesto theexecutemethod follows the same pattern as the_evaluatemethod. This ensures consistency in how method overrides are handled across different types of script execution within the script engine. The implementation is correct and follows Python best practices for merging dictionaries.
| methods = self.__get_augment_methods(task) | ||
| if external_context: | ||
| methods.update(external_context) | ||
|
|
||
| if hasattr(self, "method_overrides"): | ||
| if self.method_overrides: | ||
| methods = {**methods, **self.method_overrides} | ||
|
|
||
| # do not run script if it is blank | ||
| if script: | ||
| super().execute(task, script, methods) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [369-398]
While the implementation of method_overrides is correct and approved, it's important to consider security implications of dynamically overriding methods in a script execution environment. Ensure that method_overrides are used in a controlled manner, especially if user input can influence the methods being overridden. Consider implementing additional safeguards if necessary to prevent unauthorized method execution.
unblock bpmn unit testing with duplicate files, our script engine, get process initiator user mock
Summary by CodeRabbit