Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Associate ModuleID to externalDependencyClasspath entries #41

Closed
ijuma opened this issue Jun 6, 2011 · 3 comments
Closed

Associate ModuleID to externalDependencyClasspath entries #41

ijuma opened this issue Jun 6, 2011 · 3 comments

Comments

@ijuma
Copy link
Contributor

ijuma commented Jun 6, 2011

It's useful to know the ModuleID for each Attributed[File] returned from externalDependencyClasspath. Mark said:

"Attributed is a typesafe heterogeneous map. It is currently only used to track the Analysis instance for an entry, but could probably be extended to associate the ModuleID and Artifact with the entry. Please open a ticket if this sounds good."

The context of this is explained in more detail in the following thread about sbt-idea:

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/simple-build-tool/ccIYjMBYaLA/ReWUfVCtPu0J

harrah added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2011
@harrah harrah closed this as completed Jun 10, 2011
@ijuma
Copy link
Contributor Author

ijuma commented Jun 10, 2011

Thanks for this and other fixes committed today. :) Do you have a rough plan for when you plan to release 0.10.1?

@harrah
Copy link
Member

harrah commented Jun 10, 2011

I'd like to work with the 0.10-based build some more to ensure there aren't major issues. I think #5, #32, and #39 can be fixed for 0.10.1. I still need to evaluate #44 and #46. Also, there isn't anything in place to prevent additional work for plugin authors when a new version comes out. Perhaps this won't be done for 0.10.1, though.

@ijuma
Copy link
Contributor Author

ijuma commented Jun 10, 2011

Makes sense. I think the plugins stuff could wait until 0.10.2. For what is worth 0.10.0 has been pretty solid for me apart from polish issues and that weird issue that completely broke my build before I found the even weirder workaround:

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/simple-build-tool/2hho4BzkBDM/discussion

I still need to make some time to investigate that a bit more.

dwijnand pushed a commit to dwijnand/sbt that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2017
FPORT: Completion for build-level keys
dwijnand pushed a commit to dwijnand/sbt that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2017
This reverts commit 0da2f30, reversing
changes made to 9341858.
dwijnand pushed a commit to dwijnand/sbt that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2017
FPORT: Completion for build-level keys
dwijnand pushed a commit to dwijnand/sbt that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2017
This reverts commit 0da2f30, reversing
changes made to 9341858.
dwijnand pushed a commit to dwijnand/sbt that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2017
FPORT: Completion for build-level keys
dwijnand pushed a commit to dwijnand/sbt that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2017
This reverts commit 0da2f30, reversing
changes made to 9341858.
eed3si9n pushed a commit to eed3si9n/sbt that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2020
adpi2 pushed a commit to adpi2/sbt that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants