Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Type.members returns members in reverse order #5732

Closed
scabug opened this issue May 2, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Type.members returns members in reverse order #5732

scabug opened this issue May 2, 2012 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

@scabug scabug commented May 2, 2012

(based on feedback from multiple clients of macro/reflection API) This is very counter-intuitive and needs to be fixed, at least, in the public API. No idea whether this quirk is essential for the compiler, but it shouldn't be exposed to the outside world.

@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented May 2, 2012

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-5732?orig=1
Reporter: @xeno-by
Other Milestones: 2.10.0

@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented May 2, 2012

@paulp said:
We can/should fix it. I should have been clearer earlier, sometimes I explain why things are the way they are without elaborating that they don't have to be that way and/or that I'd rather they were a different way.

@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Jul 19, 2012

@xeno-by said (edited on Jul 19, 2012 11:29:05 AM UTC):
Cf. scala/scala#906

@scabug

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@scabug scabug commented Aug 3, 2012

@xeno-by said:
Fixed in scala/scala@a727c6f

@scabug scabug closed this Aug 3, 2012
@scabug scabug added this to the 2.10.0-M6 milestone Apr 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.