Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quickref for collection methods? #13

Open
ghost opened this issue Nov 11, 2011 · 3 comments
Open

Quickref for collection methods? #13

ghost opened this issue Nov 11, 2011 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 11, 2011

Would a quickref for collection methods be useful? I had one written down while learning the collection library where I tried to make it as compact as possible. It's mostly scala code but I had to resort to set notation for some sections and types are different too. May be too ad-hoc but putting it here as a suggestion. Maybe some alternative form can be used or quick "99 problems" examples highlighting each method.

Example can be found here.

@jsuereth
Copy link
Member

That sounds pretty awesome. Do you think it would make sense to use the cheatsheet format for that?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 21, 2011

Not for the svg graphics I linked. Maybe something like MathJax should be used but adding a color scheme to it is maybe a bit awkward. MathJax would maybe be nice regardless for various mathematical notations? If someone writes code examples instead it wouldn't be any problem using the cheatsheet.

@heathermiller
Copy link
Member

Hey Trond- sorry for completely missing this.

Do you mean that it wouldn't fit into the cheatsheet because of stuff like the subscripts? Some HTML can be used in the cheatsheets- you can use <sub></sub> for subscripts, for example, though the syntax coloring that you've got in your attached image wouldn't be very easy to drop into the existing cheatsheet template.

Though, if you think your quickref could fit into the cheatsheet template without the coloring, or if you've got some other idea of how/where you think it should fit in, let me know, it'd be a welcome addition :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants