Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SI-5858 xml.Node construction ambiguity is gone. #1731

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 11, 2012

Conversation

retronym
Copy link
Member

@retronym retronym commented Dec 8, 2012

Test case to show that the fix for SI-5859 saves the day.

Test case to show that the fix for SI-5859 saves the day.
@retronym
Copy link
Member Author

retronym commented Dec 8, 2012

Review by @paulp or anyone really.

@scala-jenkins
Copy link

Started jenkins job pr-scala-testsuite-linux-opt at https://scala-webapps.epfl.ch/jenkins/job/pr-scala-testsuite-linux-opt/1823/

@scala-jenkins
Copy link

jenkins job pr-scala-testsuite-linux-opt: Success - https://scala-webapps.epfl.ch/jenkins/job/pr-scala-testsuite-linux-opt/1823/

@scala-jenkins
Copy link

Started jenkins job pr-rangepos at https://scala-webapps.epfl.ch/jenkins/job/pr-rangepos/1111/

@scala-jenkins
Copy link

jenkins job pr-rangepos: Success - https://scala-webapps.epfl.ch/jenkins/job/pr-rangepos/1111/

@som-snytt
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not anyone really, but I see from the ticket that I looked at it during the few lame duck minutes before picking up from school, so I'm glad it worked out. Overloading and varargs were endlessly fascinating back then. But we're no longer in pre-K.

@paulp
Copy link
Contributor

paulp commented Dec 11, 2012

l-amazing-tm.

paulp added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2012
SI-5858 xml.Node construction ambiguity is gone.
@paulp paulp merged commit 3afd9cc into scala:master Dec 11, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants